Momentum Solar Lawsuit 2026: TCPA Settlement, Claims Status & Consumer Guide

Momentum Solar Lawsuit

By The Legal Briefs Editorial Team  |  Reviewed for accuracy  |  Updated 2026  |  Category: Lawsuits

The Momentum Solar lawsuit refers to a group of separate legal actions against Pro Custom Solar LLC, the company doing business as Momentum Solar, not one single case. The most significant is a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class action that reached final settlement approval in August 2025, worth up to $30 million.

This guide explains what the Momentum Solar lawsuit actually covered, where each case stands as of July 2026, whether you can still file a claim, and what to check before signing a solar contract with any installer. Every fact below is sourced from court filings, the official settlement administrator, and legal news outlets that covered the case directly not from unverified claims circulating on other sites.

If you received repeated calls from Momentum Solar, work or worked for the company, or are simply researching it before hiring, the sections below walk through the background, the timeline, your rights, and where to verify information for yourself.

Related reading:
Fischer Homes Lawsuit 2026: Defects, Warranty Denials & Buyer Rights Explained covers construction-defect and warranty claims in the homebuilding industry
Mary Ruth Organics Lawsuit: The Complete Guide in 2026 guide covers a separate consumer-protection dispute.

Quick Facts: Momentum Solar Lawsuit

DetailSummary
CompanyPro Custom Solar LLC, doing business as Momentum Solar
Founded2009, headquartered in South Plainfield, New Jersey
Main legal actionTCPA class action over unsolicited telemarketing calls
Lead casesNiemczyk v. Pro Custom Solar LLC (No. 2:19-cv-7846) and Hill et al. v. Pro Custom Solar LLC (No. 2:22-cv-00247), D.N.J.
Settlement amount$20 million to $30 million, depending on payment timing
Final court approvalAugust 18, 2025
Claim filing deadlineJuly 31, 2025 (now closed)
Eligible class periodTwo or more telemarketing calls within any 365-day period, March 5, 2015 – January 2, 2025
Who was excludedCurrent and former Momentum Solar customers
Separate legal matter2019 workplace discrimination lawsuit filed in New York
Company’s positionMomentum Solar denies wrongdoing in all matters and settled the TCPA claims to avoid further litigation costs

Sources: U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey filings; SolarTCPASettlement.com; ClassAction.org; TopClassActions.com.

Key Takeaways

  • The Momentum Solar lawsuit that reached a court-approved outcome is the TCPA telemarketing case, not a lawsuit over solar contracts or installation quality.
  • The settlement fund is $20 million minimum, rising to $30 million depending on how quickly Momentum Solar pays.
  • The claim deadline was July 31, 2025. That window is closed — you cannot file a new claim in this settlement in 2026.
  • A separate, unresolved 2019 workplace discrimination lawsuit exists and should not be confused with the TCPA case.
  • Momentum Solar has not admitted wrongdoing in either matter.

What Happened?

Between 2019 and 2022, two separate class action lawsuits accused Momentum Solar of placing telemarketing calls to consumers who had not given consent, including people whose numbers were on the National Do Not Call Registry. Both cases were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and were eventually resolved together in a single settlement.

Separately, a 2019 lawsuit filed on behalf of former warehouse employees in New York alleged race-based discrimination and retaliation. That case involves entirely different plaintiffs, claims, and legal theories, and it has not been resolved through a published settlement the way the TCPA case has.

Outside of these two formal lawsuits, homeowners have also posted complaints on consumer review sites and with state agencies about sales pitches, contract terms, and installation delays. Those reports reflect individual experiences rather than findings from a certified class action, so this guide treats them as reported complaints, not proven legal claims.

Timeline of Events

DateEvent
2009Momentum Solar (Pro Custom Solar LLC) is founded in New Jersey
2019Race discrimination lawsuit filed on behalf of former New York warehouse employees
2019Niemczyk v. Pro Custom Solar LLC filed, alleging TCPA robocall violations
2022Hill et al. v. Pro Custom Solar LLC filed, adding related TCPA claims
2023–2024Parties exchange discovery; settlement talks begin in early 2024
February 2024Parties reach a proposed settlement of $20M–$30M for the consolidated TCPA claims
January 2, 2025Court grants preliminary approval of the settlement
July 31, 2025Deadline for class members to submit a valid claim form
August 18, 2025Court grants final approval of the settlement
2026Settlement moves into the distribution phase; claim window remains closed; the workplace lawsuit and general consumer complaints continue to be tracked separately

Background Information: Who Is Momentum Solar?

Momentum Solar is the trade name of Pro Custom Solar LLC, a residential solar installer founded in 2009 in South Plainfield, New Jersey. Over roughly fifteen years, it grew into one of the largest privately held solar companies in the country, operating across states including California, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Florida.

The company offers home energy consultations, solar system design and installation, financing and leasing options including power purchase agreements (PPAs), and post-installation monitoring. Its growth tracked the broader boom in residential solar driven by federal tax credits and state renewable-energy incentives.

Primary Allegations and Claims

TCPA robocall and telemarketing claims

The plaintiffs in Niemczyk and Hill alleged that Momentum Solar, or agents calling on its behalf, placed telemarketing calls to consumers without prior consent — including to numbers registered on the National Do Not Call Registry. Under the TCPA, statutory damages generally run $500 to $1,500 per violating call, which is why even a modest number of unwanted calls to a large class of consumers can add up to significant potential liability.

Workplace discrimination allegations

The separate 2019 lawsuit, filed by Wigdor LLP on behalf of former employees at a New York warehouse, alleged systemic race discrimination and retaliation. This claim is legally and factually distinct from the TCPA case.

Consumer complaints about sales and installation

Beyond the two lawsuits, some homeowners have raised concerns about savings projections, contract terms, and delays. These have not, to date, produced a certified consumer class action comparable to the TCPA settlement, so treat them as individual reports rather than adjudicated claims.

Key Court Filings

  • Niemczyk v. Pro Custom Solar LLC, No. 2:19-cv-07846-MAH, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey — the original TCPA complaint filed in 2019.
  • Hill et al. v. Pro Custom Solar LLC, No. 2:22-cv-00247, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey — a related 2022 TCPA complaint later consolidated with Niemczyk for settlement purposes.
  • Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, granted January 2, 2025.
  • Final Approval Order, entered August 18, 2025, following a fairness hearing.
  • Settlement Agreement and accompanying Memorandum in Support of Final Approval, filed with the court, which lays out the $20–30 million payment structure, the class definition, and the plan of distribution.

These filings, along with the settlement notice, are available through the official case administration site, SolarTCPASettlement.com, and through PACER for the District of New Jersey docket.

Company Response

Momentum Solar has consistently denied wrongdoing in both the TCPA litigation and the workplace discrimination lawsuit. In the TCPA case, the company agreed to settle without admitting liability — a standard resolution that lets a defendant avoid the cost, time, and uncertainty of continued litigation rather than a legal finding of fault. No public statement from Momentum Solar has conceded the underlying allegations in either matter as of this writing.

The TCPA case turned on consent: whether the calls Momentum Solar or its agents made had the recipient’s prior express permission, and whether the company respected the Do Not Call Registry. Because TCPA damages are set by statute rather than proven actual harm, plaintiffs did not need to show financial loss from each call — only that unauthorized calls occurred, which is part of why solar and home-services companies using outbound telemarketing face outsized settlement exposure compared to their marketing spend.

The class-action structure matters here too. Because the settlement fund is shared pro rata among everyone who filed a valid claim, individual payouts depend on how many calls a claimant documented and how many total claims were filed — not a fixed dollar amount published in advance. Attorneys’ fees in the settlement were capped at up to one-third of the fund, which is within the typical range courts approve in TCPA class settlements.

The 2019 workplace discrimination case follows a different legal track entirely, under federal and New York state anti-discrimination and retaliation law, and its resolution — whether by settlement, dismissal, or trial — will not affect the TCPA settlement in any way.

Settlement Information

Momentum Solar agreed to pay a minimum of $20 million into the settlement fund. If that amount is not paid within seven years of the date the court entered final judgment, the company is required to pay in increments until the total reaches $30 million. Under the settlement’s plan of distribution, an initial payment was scheduled after final approval, with the fund building toward full payout on the schedule set in the agreement.

Eligible class members who filed a timely, valid claim are entitled to a pro rata share of the fund on a per-call basis, after attorneys’ fees, administrative costs, and the court-approved service awards for the named plaintiffs are deducted. The settlement agreement and FAQ published by the administrator do not list a fixed per-person dollar amount, because the final share depends on the total number of valid claims filed against the fund — that detail was not knowable until after the July 31, 2025 claim deadline passed.

Current and former Momentum Solar customers were excluded from this settlement; it was designed for people who received unwanted calls but never became customers.

Current Status of the Case

  • TCPA settlement: Closed to new claims. Final court approval was granted August 18, 2025, and the case has moved into the payment-distribution phase.
  • Workplace discrimination lawsuit: Remains a separate, ongoing legal matter as tracked by legal news outlets; no published settlement comparable to the TCPA case has been reported.
  • General consumer complaints: No certified class action currently covers sales-practice or installation complaints. Individual disputes are being handled case by case through consumer agencies, arbitration, or direct negotiation, depending on each homeowner’s contract terms.

Potential Outcomes

For the TCPA settlement, the remaining question is distribution: how and when the fund pays out to class members who filed valid claims, based on the payment schedule Momentum Solar agreed to. Class members who filed a claim do not need to take further action beyond monitoring the official settlement site for payment updates.

For the workplace discrimination case, possible outcomes include a negotiated settlement, dismissal of some or all claims, or a trial verdict — none of which has been publicly reported as final. For consumer sales complaints, potential paths include informal resolution with the company, state attorney general involvement, individual arbitration (if the contract includes an arbitration clause), or a future class action if enough similar, verifiable claims are consolidated — none of which currently exists as a certified case.

Impact on Consumers

The TCPA settlement’s direct impact is limited to people who received two or more unwanted telemarketing calls in the specified window and filed a claim before the deadline. For everyone else — including current customers and homeowners evaluating Momentum Solar today — the practical impact is informational: it’s a documented example of a real telemarketing-compliance issue at the company, alongside the separate, unresolved workplace allegations.

How Momentum Solar compares to other major residential solar companies

CompanyFoundedBusiness ModelCoverage
Momentum Solar2009Sales, financing, leasing, PPANortheast, mid-Atlantic, select Sun Belt states
Sunrun2007Leasing and PPA-focused, plus purchaseNationwide
Tesla Solar (formerly SolarCity)2006 (SolarCity)Direct purchase and financing, integrated with Tesla batteriesNationwide
SunPower1985Dealer network model, purchase and financingNationwide

Vivint Solar merged into Sunrun in 2020 and no longer operates as a separate company. This table reflects general, publicly available business information and is not a comparison of legal histories.

Who May Be Affected

  • Consumers who received two or more telemarketing calls from or on behalf of Momentum Solar within any 365-day period between March 5, 2015, and January 2, 2025, and who filed a claim by July 31, 2025.
  • Former employees at the New York warehouse named in the 2019 discrimination lawsuit.
  • Homeowners with unresolved individual disputes over sales representations, contract terms, or installation — who are not covered by either of the above cases and would need to pursue their own remedy.

What Affected Individuals Should Know

If you filed a claim in the TCPA settlement

No further action is required to preserve your claim. Check SolarTCPASettlement.com periodically for distribution updates, and keep the confirmation you received when you submitted your claim.

If you missed the July 31, 2025 deadline

You generally cannot receive a payout from this specific settlement. It’s still worth confirming current status directly through the official settlement site or a consumer-rights attorney, since procedures can occasionally allow late claims in limited circumstances.

If you have a current contract or installation dispute

Review your agreement for cancellation terms, warranty coverage, and any arbitration clause. Keep signed documents, utility bills from before and after installation, and records of communication. Escalate first to the company, then to your state attorney general or the FTC if unresolved.

What Happens Next

The TCPA settlement fund will continue to distribute payments to valid claimants according to the schedule set in the settlement agreement, which runs on a multi-year timeline tied to when Momentum Solar completes payment into the fund. No new claims can be added to this settlement.

The 2019 workplace discrimination case remains open as a separate matter, and its resolution — if and when it is publicly reported — would not reopen or affect the TCPA settlement. Consumers with individual sales or installation disputes should expect to resolve those directly with the company, through arbitration, or through their state consumer protection agency, since no consolidated case currently exists for those complaints.

Latest 2026 Update

As of July 2026, the TCPA settlement remains in its post-approval distribution phase, with payments to valid claimants proceeding on the schedule set out in the settlement agreement rather than as a single lump-sum payout. No new consumer class action against Momentum Solar covering sales practices or installation quality has reached court certification as of this writing, despite claims to the contrary circulating on some third-party sites; readers should treat any site advertising a “new 2026 settlement” for solar contract disputes with caution unless it links directly to a court docket or an official settlement administrator page.

A Quick, Quotable Summary

The Momentum Solar lawsuit story is really two separate legal narratives: a resolved TCPA class action over unwanted telemarketing calls, now paying out on a multi-year schedule, and a separate, unresolved workplace discrimination allegation from 2019. Neither should be confused with the other, and neither, on its own, is a reason to rule the company in or out for a solar purchase.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is the Momentum Solar lawsuit still active in 2026?

The main TCPA class action reached final settlement approval on August 18, 2025, and the claims window closed on July 31, 2025. A separate 2019 workplace discrimination lawsuit and general consumer complaints continue to be tracked, but there is no lawsuit still open for new consumer claims as of 2026.

What was the Momentum Solar TCPA lawsuit about?

It alleged that Momentum Solar, or agents acting on its behalf, made unsolicited telemarketing calls to consumers, including people on the National Do Not Call Registry, without proper consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Can I still file a claim in the Momentum Solar TCPA settlement?

No. The deadline to submit a claim form was July 31, 2025. Consumers who missed the deadline generally cannot receive a payout from this specific settlement, though it’s worth confirming current status through the official settlement website.

How much could claimants receive from the settlement?

Individual payouts depend on the number of valid claims filed against the $20–30 million fund, after attorneys’ fees and administrative costs, on a per-call basis. Amounts were not fixed at a set dollar figure per person and vary by claimant.

Were Momentum Solar customers eligible for the TCPA settlement?

No. The settlement specifically excluded current and former Momentum Solar customers. It was intended for people who received unwanted telemarketing calls but did not become customers.

What other lawsuits involve Momentum Solar?

A separate 2019 lawsuit alleged race discrimination and retaliation at a New York warehouse. This case is legally distinct from the TCPA settlement and involves different claims and plaintiffs, and it remains unresolved.

Does the settlement mean Momentum Solar admitted wrongdoing?

No. Momentum Solar has denied the allegations in both the TCPA case and the workplace discrimination matter. Settling a lawsuit is a common way to avoid further litigation costs and does not itself establish legal fault.

Conclusion

The Momentum Solar lawsuit is best understood as two distinct legal matters rather than one ongoing case: a TCPA telemarketing settlement that’s closed to new claims and now paying out over time, and a separate, unresolved 2019 workplace discrimination lawsuit. For homeowners evaluating Momentum Solar in 2026, the practical takeaway is the same as with any major home-improvement purchase — read the contract closely, verify financing and tax-credit claims independently, keep records of every communication, and know where to file a complaint if something goes wrong.

Sources and References

  • U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey — Niemczyk v. Pro Custom Solar LLC, No. 2:19-cv-07846-MAH
  • U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey — Hill et al. v. Pro Custom Solar LLC, No. 2:22-cv-00247
  • Official settlement administration site: SolarTCPASettlement.com
  • ClassAction.org, “Up to $30M Momentum Solar Settlement Ends Class Action Lawsuits Over Alleged Robocalls”
  • TopClassActions.com, “$30M Momentum Solar calls class action settlement”
  • Federal Trade Commission, consumer.ftc.gov — Do Not Call Registry and telemarketing complaint guidance
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — financing-related complaint guidance

This article is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for guidance on your specific situation.

Chief Editor - The Legal Briefs
Magdalene Freida is a legal news writer at The Legal Briefs, covering U.S. lawsuits, Supreme Court cases, and breaking legal developments. She specializes in simplifying complex legal topics into clear, reader-friendly content for a wide audience. Her work focuses on accurate reporting, legal research, and SEO-driven journalism across the United States.